For nonprofit leaders

Make measurement useful to the decisions your nonprofit has to make.

Prova helps executive and program leaders determine what they can responsibly say about results, identify the questions that remain open, and build a measurement approach their team can actually sustain.

For a renewal, board question, program redesign, expansion, or strategy decision.

When Prova can help

Bring the decision your current reporting cannot answer.

01

A renewal or major proposal depends on claims current measurement cannot yet support.

02

Leadership must decide whether to continue, expand, redesign, or stop a program.

03

Reporting absorbs staff time but leaves program leaders without clearer direction.

04

A growing program can no longer rely mainly on staff knowledge and case-by-case learning.

05

The program has changed, but its theory of change or measurement has not kept up.

06

A board or leadership question has no single report designed to answer it.

The decision gap

Use the information you already have to decide what to do next.

Reporting asks

What happened during the grant?

A decision asks

What should we continue, change, expand, or stop?

Your team may already collect substantial program data and prepare careful grant reports. Those materials may describe what happened without helping leaders decide what to continue, change, expand, or stop.

Prova's proprietary evidence systems keep important statements connected to their sources, make gaps and exceptions visible, and direct consequential questions to accountable professional review. Frontier models provide breadth and speed inside those systems; named people remain responsible for the conclusion.

Choose the kind of help your decision needs.

Start with the decision your team needs to make—not a method or deliverable. These are three distinct Prova offerings, and Prova will recommend the smallest useful scope.

AnswersNeed to know what you can responsibly say now?Find out what your nonprofit can responsibly say about its results. Prova reads across years of files, reports, notes, feedback, research, and data to show what your existing information can answer, where the answer becomes uncertain, and what is still unknown.Possible output: Claims and Sources Map — see which claims are backed by which sourcesSee what your current information can—and cannot—answerClose example

What you may receive

Claims and Sources Map

Claims and Sources MapIllustrative

What the current material supports

Every claim the organization already makes, set against what is actually behind it.

The claimSupportWhat it rests on
85% of enrolled participants complete the programstrongAttendance logs and program files, 2022–2024
Employer partners value the placementspartialThree partner interviews; no wider follow-up
Participants leave with more confidencethinDescribed in staff notes; never measured directly
The program leads to lasting employmentabsentNo contact with participants after they exit
absentthinpartialstrong
Illustrative example—not client work
ThroughlineNeed to test how a program is expected to produce results?Test the assumptions behind a program before you expand, redesign, or defend it. Prova examines the connections from activities to change, links them to relevant research, and separates what is supported elsewhere from what must still be learned locally.Possible output: Research-Linked Theory of Change — see how the program is expected to create results and where assumptions remainSee how the assumptions behind your program hold upClose example

What you may receive

Research-Linked Theory of Change

Research-Linked Theory of ChangeIllustrative

Which links outside research supports—and which the program still needs to test

The same support scale, applied to the links between steps rather than to finished claims.

Young people complete a 12-week training placement
They gain skills employers are hiring for
They find steady work within six months
Their households become more financially stable
absentthinpartialstrong
Illustrative example—not client work
MeasurementNeed to decide what your team should measure next?Build only the measurement your team will actually use. Prova begins with the decisions the information must serve, then works backward toward focused measures, feasible routines, clear responsibilities, and useful review points.Possible output: Measurement Architecture — see what to measure, how to collect it, and who will use itSee which measures are worth your team’s timeClose example

What you may receive

Measurement Architecture

Measurement ArchitectureIllustrative

Which measures earn the time they take

Each measure the team already collects, placed by staff time and how far it moves a real decision. Both are the team's judgment—not a calculated score.

Measurement burden against decision valueNine measures plotted by staff time to collect and how much each informs a decision. Two measures sit in the high-cost, low-value corner. A six-month follow-up, not currently collected, would sit high on decision value.Worth protectingCostly, decides littleMonthly attendanceEmployer feedback surveyExit interviewStaff case notesSatisfaction star ratingIntake demographics formWeekly activity logQuarterly funder narrativeSix-month follow-upnot collected todayStaff time to collect →Informs a decision →
Collected todayCandidate to stopMissing, worth adding

The same measures as a table

MeasureStaff timeDecision valueStatus
Monthly attendance2070Collected today
Employer feedback survey3380Collected today
Exit interview5468Collected today
Staff case notes6658Collected today
Satisfaction star rating1822Collected today
Intake demographics form4234Collected today
Weekly activity log7211Candidate to stop
Quarterly funder narrative9020Candidate to stop
Six-month follow-up6294Not collected today
Illustrative example—not client work

Your engagement will be shaped around the decision you need to make. Prova will recommend the smallest piece of work that can give you a useful, responsible answer.

What the work should leave behind

Leave with a decision—and a practical way to keep learning.

The result may be a usable answer now, a narrower claim, a changed program, a focused open question, or the smallest practical measurement step fitted to the team's capacity.

Discuss a nonprofit decision

Direct and foundation-funded work

Keep control of the question, the materials, and what gets shared.

Direct nonprofit engagement

Your team sets the question and decides how the work will be used.

Prova works directly with your materials, decision, and measurement needs.

Foundation-sponsored engagement

A foundation may fund the work without owning your question.

Your organization chooses whether to participate, selects the materials, and decides what may be shared.

Why Prova can work across more of what you already know

Examine more information without losing the sources, limits, or human judgment.

The organizing layer

Prova's proprietary evidence systems

Organize the question, permitted record—the materials agreed for the work—standards, source connections, challenge, review, and decision path.

Frontier AI within the systems

Performs bounded reading, retrieval, extraction, comparison, tracing, synthesis, drafting, and monitoring.

Accountable people

Frame consequential questions, interpret context, challenge the record, judge what it supports, approve conclusions, and decide what happens next.

The model is a component. Prova's proprietary systems organize the work. Named professionals remain responsible for consequential conclusions.

A practical first step

Bring one decision your team needs to make.

Bring the decision and the materials you already know exist. The first conversation will establish what the work needs to answer and whether Prova is the right fit. No file upload or formal brief is required.

Discuss a nonprofit decision